Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/27/2023 in Posts

  1. Through countless rewrites, revisions, removals, and translations . . . . is it any wonder that people question the intent and accuracy of the Bible? Your truth is not everyone's truth. There are many folks around the world in many different cultures that know nothing of the Bible, but are fine moral people. They know their truth and it likely isn't your truth, and it's wrong of Bible adherents to try to trump someone else's belief system.
    2 points
  2. Putin Bum-boy Backs Ass-hole In Pathetic Attempt At Anti-Trudeau Post.
    2 points
  3. Fat Trudeau begins yelling at a protester who doesn't support a blank cheque to the third most corrupt country on the planet
    1 point
  4. Leviticus is the third book of the Torah those laws are Judaism not Christianity
    1 point
  5. 1 point
  6. If one party has the power of life and death over another, you can't assume anything that happens between them is consensual. That should be obvious to even the dimmest.
    1 point
  7. Didn't we already do something like that?
    1 point
  8. These people are connected to the land they live on. You can't just move them all to another piece of land and call it a day. It's not going to work.
    1 point
  9. We won't call it that until we're confederated from California to Alaska. Whatever they call it we'll be amongst the next set of super-powes that follow the Great Interregnum. I figure 500 - 1000 years from now. Maybe 250 if we're lucky.
    1 point
  10. No, those are things that you've decided the Bible is "the authority on". That's your belief. Your religious beliefs are your subjective truths, but they are not facts.
    1 point
  11. It will be an utter humiliation for the USA if China shows the world that they are the lead dog here, on such a large stage. Xi = ? ? Biden = ??
    1 point
  12. I don't think anyone can seriously argue that CBC isn't a Liberal mouthpiece. It's been that way for decades, and IIRC it was censured by some ombudsman or whatever for demonstrating a clearly partisan Liberal bias, way back in mid-2000's.
    1 point
  13. That's a good idea. They could have North and South America and the rest of us should go back where we came from. The fellow who trained me has always said his ancestors had a too lax immigration system
    1 point
  14. oh yikes. This all happened within the past 10 days. I read an article last week that China made an announcement that it will not be supporting Russia. But after reading recent headlines I can see that you're right. This may be worse than I thought...I see US stated that there may be severe consequences if China backs Russia with lethal support. Uh oh...
    1 point
  15. For instance, in 2020 he said that if Joe Biden won, Republicans would be “hunted” and the police would “stand down.” Hasn’t happened. He compared women demanding equal pay to children demanding candy.
    1 point
  16. As ILLEGAL as "Shock and Awe"? Ummm...https://www.bbc.com/news/60571253
    1 point
  17. He’s been a crackpot for a while.
    1 point
  18. Gave several links. Read them. No need to fix anything. Like I said, "clown-fella", "Science advances regularly, some minds and perceptions lag behind. ".
    1 point
  19. Forbes, THE VIEW in magazine form? Trump is the most honest president in history.
    1 point
  20. A. Hard deadlines won't work. Innovation takes time. The current battery technology isn't where it needs to be, to compete with what is currently on the market. I could fill a full sized gas powered pick up truck from empty faster than most vehicles on the market even at a fraction of the size. Plus, it is not recommended to fill past 80% on super chargers, as you're weakening the battery capacity over time. This makes this worse, especially for the vehicles with weaker ranges. I mean, there are fueling stations everywhere. I run out, I have nothing to worry about. I live in a highly urbanized city, but outside its borders, I rely heavily on apps to hopefully find a super charger charging station. I shouldn't feel anxiety when driving and don't with my car. Always have driving electric ones, if driving long distances. Forcing people to change, vs incentives to do so, will make most shun the technology as long as they can. B. Until this is fixed across the board, deadlines are just like building designs. They look pretty, but until you factor in physics, or in this case infrastructure, they remain just that. Pretty numbers. C. One needs to plan for unintended consequences of flipping an entire population onto an already burdened grid with an added and major load. D. They will help, but people tend to buy things when they work for them. Meaning, if I want a luxury car, I can spend 45k on an electric car and get just that. If I can get way more bang for my buck getting say, a Lexus, most will likely go for the latter. Very few will have an appetite to buy to save the planet. Most suffer from the "what's in it for me" syndrome. E. Build a solid infrastructure, and a product that competes and beats fuel powered cars, and people will naturally opt for the better choice. Until its the better choice, only those wanting to feel like they are doing something for the planet, will care for the technology.
    1 point
  21. The chances of an incident go up considerably if we do nothing. We were doing nothing and war broke out with ukraine. How long till he takes a poke at poland (again) and suddenly it's even more tense. The reasoning your using is perhaps understandable but it's the same reasoning Chamberlin used just before ww2. Doing nothing encourages them to do more till they see where that line is. That's not how he sees it. That's how he tries to sell it. But he knows the truth of it. He got two fists and a foot into the tar baby and the west is using it to humiliate him and weaken him. As to the exit, hard to say but there are a number of possibilities. Zelazny may not want to negotiate a peace that involves giving up any territory but he also can't continue if the allies stop giving him arms. And the russians may not like whatever deal is put on the table but they know the allies can always send even more gear and russia could lose.' And they can bluster about nukes all they want but everyone knows it's bullshit. So - at the end of the day the only way to deal with a bully is to stand up to them. Sure - there's an element of risk but there's even more risk doing nothing Well reasonable endgames would include russia keeps crimea and part of the donbas but ukraine either signs on with nato or does a nato lite contract and is firmly in the western sphere. Or retreat to prewar lines but the us says they won't let ukraine into nato ever. When both sides get really sick of it and one gets the upper hand we'll see negotiatons start. Too soon just yet. And russia wont' be using 'every plane and every tank'. And if that does happen they will retreat, as they have always done. They won't be interested in losing their whole country to a nuclear war. DUDE!!!! - family forum here, put your 'little man' away, and stop talking to it for that matter
    1 point
  22. Nobody is saying that Russia is attacking NATO, or plans to attack NATO, so that's a nice strawman you've set up to argue against Mr. and yet you're the one who's spent the last year nattering about nuclear holocaust, and the oft-threatened RUssIan EScALATion. ?
    1 point
  23. A eugenicist wanting to kill the poor.. just like Margret Sanger
    1 point
  24. I am pointing out how stupid you are for believing that all children saved from the abortionists are doomed to poverty and neglect.
    1 point
  25. Just cause you don't understand what I'm telling you does not mean my posts are unintelligent. It just means you're a dim witted FOOL whose ONLY contribution here is calling posters childish names. ?
    1 point
  26. Liberals love and admire the Communist Party in China so I don't think this will move the needle. It's crazy how many Communist lovers are down east. Too bad they control federal elections and are bought off by China
    1 point
  27. Well, war for them is peace for us You'll never fight a war more inexpensively than we're fighting this one.
    1 point
  28. Nobody cares. It's been a couple of days now and the mainstream media is like "Ho hum". Hardly a thing about this is appearing anywhere. A Liberal MP is, according to CSIS, a knowing agent of a hostile foreign power that puts Muslims in concentration camps. And the media doesn't care. But oh let a couple of Tory MPs do a picture with a European MEP whose party is against immigration and anti-Islam and it's headline news from coast to coast with breathless outrage being voiced on all the political panels.
    1 point
  29. No, you need to change your thinking. The power asymmetry makes consent impossible in the same way that there cannot be consent between and adult and a minor child.
    1 point
  30. How is it delicious that slave owners treated their slaves as sexual objects to be used at their whim.
    1 point
  31. The fat one with the moustache. The other two are obviously photoshop.
    1 point
  32. Personally, I could careless as to who wins this feud between Russia and Ukraine. But the west should mind its own bloody business and not be getting involved in this feud one bit. It's their war and not ours to help fight. The story has it that Ukraine has now received from America close to a $100 billion in aid to Ukraine. And Zelensky still cannot win the battle. Wake up, mac. ?
    1 point
  33. So that's 1. the Dept of Energy, 2. the FBI and 3. the US DoD now. The former director of the American CDC, Robert Redfield, also said that it was "biologically implausible" that the virus arose from nature. His reasoning was that viruses that jump directly from an animal (like a bat) to humans, are NOT immediately contagious. There has to be an intermediary animal (or several). Yet after testing over 80,000 species, no intermediary animal has been found. To this day. Only a virus with a head start in being acclimated to humans would be this infectious. Ease of transmission of SARS-CoV2, by itself, is evidence that strongly suggests human intervention in it's creation. This seems to be the reason why the Chinese lied in the early days about how transmissible the virus was - they denied human-to-human transmission initially and the WHO took them at their word - until Taiwan proved otherwise. They didn't want to draw attention to how transmissible it was, because of the additional questions that would have been raised. Every scientist from around the world - and there were hundreds - were silenced for pointing this out. Without censorship of science, we likely would have identified the animal (if the virus actually made the zoonotic leap) and had an actual working vaccine by now. Scientific censorship and covering-up set us back drastically. Which is why I come down hard on those who demand MORE censorship - like @dialamah does.
    1 point
  34. I have no doubt there are conservatives who do know better which suggests you people are something new and different - a never before seen type of conservative or not even conservatives at all - something alien to our ideo-illogical landscape.
    1 point
  35. Compared to you people? Christ-on-a-stick you have got to be kidding me. But yeah, it's looking really inevitable don't you think?
    1 point
  36. Conservatives don't support Putin. We only support Canada. And sending billions of our tax dollars to one of the most corrupt nations on the planet IS NOT in our best interest
    1 point
  37. At that point I knew the rest would be bunk LOL Time to move on and get over it. What is a Vaccine? "Vaccination is a simple, safe, and effective way of protecting you against harmful diseases, before you come into contact with them. It uses your body’s natural defenses to build resistance to specific infections and makes your immune system stronger. Vaccines train your immune system to create antibodies, just as it does when it’s exposed to a disease. However, because vaccines contain only killed or weakened forms of germs like viruses or bacteria, they do not cause the disease or put you at risk of its complications." https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/vaccines-and-immunization-what-is-vaccination "A vaccine is a type of medicine that trains the body’s immune system so that it can fight a disease it has not come into contact with before. Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, rather than treat a disease once you have caught it." https://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/how-do-vaccines-work https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vaccine
    1 point
  38. I have little doubt it was. Just as WWII was entirely preventable with a timely and decisive action. It's just too bad we couldn't learn, forget others mistakes, our own. Because you could be sending your people otherwise? This is exactly the same argument as pre-WWII and look how it ended. If Putins, Uns and such of the world are allowed to barge in, destroy and kill, from now on, and with nukes as added argument, what kind of world would we be opening door to? Are you sure you would be safe under that little umbrella?
    1 point
  39. Who;s the second? Is it us? It's us isn't it. Well at least he didn't declare the emergency act on the guy
    1 point
  40. There are a lot of people out there who have been psychologically traumatized by 3 years of fear-mongering and I think they likely will never be normal again. They can't let go of masking, they want more lockdowns no matter the continued economic devastation, they want more restrictions, they want more censorship, they don't think the government went far enough in coercing people - losing jobs and careers wasn't enough for them. I've asked here many times - what more do they want - and gotten no reply. I think they don't want to speak the words out loud, but I believe they want jailings, detention camps and possible firing squads, since they equate not masking to murder. There was only one study on masking during covid put out by the CDC, in response to them not doing any studies, so they hurriedly put one together in Kentucky. Of course, showing masks stopped the spread. That study was widely debunked almost the second it came out and no one even cites it anymore. For people who have been psychologically damaged by the extreme fear pumped out relentlessly for years - there is no science, no studies, no data that will convince them that masks are useless, the lockdowns damaged society and the economy and stopped nothing, the restrictions were bizarre and non-sensical......like I say - there are some people who will never be normal mentally again. And you're trying to convince them. You can't. They're mentally damaged.
    1 point
  41. Once in awhile a hermetically sealed troll posts something that warrants response, even if for the subject line. 1. Descendants ? Meaning her children, or children's children, or later.... okaaaay. 2. Ancestors, I guess is what you mean. So you have now "discovered" that white slaveowners raped their slaves. Just brilliant. Really you should go away.
    1 point
  42. The major difference between MMGW and historic climate changes (aside from those caused by major impacts or mega-volcanoes), is the accelerated pace of the changes.
    1 point
  43. No it's already happening. An impact has been made and it isn't pretty. The increasing frequency and ferocity of extreme weather events and things like rising sea levels and the megadrought in the Western US are, among the science community, understood to be symptoms of anthropogenic warming. If you want a calendar date for extinction or something, I don't think we have a good model for that.
    1 point
  44. So when the bible says “kill gay people”, then it is moral to kill gay people? Or it was moral at the time, but now it is not?
    0 points
  45. Nothing more. I just found it profoundly sad. I can't imagine what it would have felt like if my parents had used a fundamental part of my identity as a casual insult.
    0 points
  46. I don't need to. You gave the traditional definition of a vaccine, which everyone already knows. So that is a waste of forum space. As to your dirty links, I won't touch those. I'm talking about the quotes you gave, which by your admission are completely incorrect. The new "substance" is a wholly different technology that turns YOU INTO A VACCINE.
    0 points
  47. https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisadellatto/2023/02/26/timeline-how-the-covid-lab-leak-origin-story-went-from-conspiracy-theory-to-government-debate/?sh=3cc37b3637b9 Sooo...looks like the Libbies have once again been proven wrong. What a shocker. The question now becomes...'Where the hell is Fauci?'. Fauci went way out of his way to convince the world The Rona was a natural occurrence. That's because his organization was funding this gain of function crap all over the world...including Wuhan. This POS needs to be caged and the WHO needs to be disbanded. These fcks all knew that happened and denied it vehemently.
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...