Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/27/2023 in Posts

  1. Yes you are twisting words around as you see fit, how about using them in the same context as i was... Just minutes ago you refused they even existed, now they are just predictions, predictions on how they want to see the world in 2030... why even put them out there if they were so far out there... is that an act that normal organization put out there, or is it just to feed the theories you talk about...Cause it adds nothing to their credibility... Are you denying there is not one global leader that has not adopted any of the WEF ideas or programs...Justin has been copying them for a while now, and just down south has brought in the same type of programs under the same names. And yes i would say he is an idio* as well. WOW meat consumption is up, would have nothing to do with there being more people on the planet...and how do you explain what is happening in Europe right now with restricting how many farm animals they can process, becasue of COW FAR*S... This is how our conversation typical end...you shouting me or anyone that has a difference of opinion down, then directing them to STF* and accuse them of shouting from the roof tops, i think if you read any of my posts thats not what i am doing. at all. .. you just can not help yourself, and can not believe someone can have a different opinion...or interest...
    3 points
  2. You’re describing the scary overreach that has become ubiquitous in government and organizations in Canada today. It’s put a chill on free speech because everyone is afraid of being canceled, losing their jobs and reputations, etc. Canada has dropped down in freedom rankings for these reasons. We are increasingly told what we should think and how we should live in top-down totalitarian fashion. Anyone who has studied history should know where this attack on free thinking leads. We can refer to the Spanish Inquisition, McCarthyism, the various purges in communist and fascist countries. Disagreement on matters of opinion has become grounds for mistreatment by employers, media, etc. I don’t know exactly when this got out of control in recent years, but the pandemic response certainly heightened the situation. It always starts for “good” reasons: ending racism, communism, sexism, public health emergencies, environmental catastrophe, etc. Having free exchange and debate of ideas suddenly became misinformation, conspiracy, and so on. The shift against freedom today is supported by cutting edge surveillance, data collection, and enforcement systems. That’s why we should be highly critical of new centralized controls, such as digital state currencies. Government and big businesses are working closely together like in the days of the fascist regimes to make sure citizens follow the path of “good” behaviour.
    3 points
  3. KXL was delayed a year by Barry. The Donald approved it all as soon as he took office. Biden killed it finally as soon as he took office. I didn't say this was a new battle...clown-boy...I said in 2012 they...you...were not actively squelching the oil industry. Clown-boy...
    3 points
  4. Given the clear grab for power that took place during covid and the overreaction in the form of unproven and unscientific NPIs and the desire to re-shape the world for now a climate "crisis", is it completely irrational to suspect that the interventions and grabs for authoritarian power for the climate "crisis" will be any different? They want everyone driving electric vehicles - which few can afford - and want everyone on digital IDs for easy tracking of locations and carbon footprints. So, some can sense a time coming, very quickly, where we are confined to a 15-Minute radius of your home, and if you try to drive further, your car shuts down and your digital ID both reports you and takes money directly from your account to fine you. Governments WILL have that ability, that is a fact. The question is - will they? Some say that given the excesses, authoritarianism and overreactions to covid, it shows their hand. So far, the only rebuttal I've heard is "Oh, for gawd's sake, they'd never do that to us." Except they just did. And they loved every minute of it.
    3 points
  5. A Pfizer employee, and a high up one at that makes some startling admissions. And there is even a bit of humour in it when the man in question brings up the diversity of the camera crew!? I was wondering if this guy was actually working for Pfizer and apparently he is. Was Jordon Trishton Walker a Pfizer Executive? - USSA News | The Tea Party's Front Page. Who says we can't have a laugh when we hear news stories?
    2 points
  6. I think i have apologized enough for my over sight, time to let it go... Now we are into playing word games, Yes the WEF is a forum, made up of some very influential people, who according to your suggestions they are not very influential at all... which is why our government has used dozens of their ideas, ya no influence at all....And i did not point out a singular agenda, i originally pointed out dozens...including a WEF web sight that has 8 to 10 items they promote, not some 4 Chan site... and you have yet to look at, makes me think this conversation is going exactly where all our conversations go round and round until i get dizzy....It is easy to sit back and tell the world they are full of shit, but you have not provided one single piece of evidence to back your claim...instead your follow your own moto and deny deny deny... And just as a side note, not once have i promoted this topic as a conspiracy theory, what i have said countless times was the topic interests me and i want to follow it, and what i posted was what i thought was strange or unusual... you seem to think those items i did post are normal behavior... Beware this is not a Chan4 theory...it is an actual WEF U tube video... I found the video becauase some of you are having issues with reading... n a promotional video, the World Economic Forum summarizes the eight predictions in the following statements: People will own nothing. Goods are either free of charge or must be lent from the state. The United States will no longer be the leading superpower, but a handful of countries will dominate. Organs will not be transplanted but printed. Meat consumption will be minimized. Massive displacement of people will take place with billions of refugees. To limit the emission of carbon dioxide, a global price will be set at an exorbitant level. People can prepare to go to Mars and start a journey to find alien life. Western values will be tested to the breaking point.. 8 predictions for the world in 2030 | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) Whoops did it again... these must be fake news
    2 points
  7. 2 points
  8. That is not the case that's been discussed in this topic. You say something you think without any association to your employer, never mentioning them from you home, during your free time. Next morning the employer runs a "tribunal" on the grounds that it may have affected their "reputation" and fires you. That would be clearly, a) arbitrary dismissal, and you should be able to sue the employer, including damages for violating your constitutional rights; b) a gross violation of the constitutional rights. But wait, there's more. Who would be the employer here, in most cases no other than the government itself. Governments in violation of constitutional rights? So should they be allowed to use those pads, "professional associations" to do the same job on their behalf? The solution is easy, define jurisdictions clearly and specifically: only clear professional misconduct, in direct execution of professional duties is in the jurisdiction of "associations" and "tribunals". And for everything else, for overstepping jurisdiction even by a half a step or inch, their a..es can (and should be) sued off, that time sure, for damaging reputations, exemplary damages for overstepping authority all of that. Only this way the society can make "because we can" folk learn because they will always come to believe that yes, they can and try it again. Persistently, tirelessly and regularly. That's a fact, nothing to discuss here, proven, certified and stamped by history.
    2 points
  9. OMG get off your high horse. Were you right about something for once in your life and now you can't let it go? I can't even believe some of you guys didn't change your usernames again after all the things you said about covid that turned out to be just as stupid as they sounded.
    2 points
  10. 'On the Origin of the Deadliest Pandemic in 100 Years' . . . . . Elaine Dewar. Excellent book . . . gives the timeline, dates, places, and names.
    2 points
  11. 2 points
  12. Good god, planned cities are not a new thing in much of the world and none of them are ghettos. You really need to get a grip.
    2 points
  13. Just because the thread title says something, does not make it true. The source of your article? Fox News. Yeah, believe them to tell you honestly that they crushed their competitors.
    2 points
  14. Thank you for speaking truth in a time where down is up, up is down, left is right... It's refreshing to see there's still people with common sense
    1 point
  15. Even at 150 Mbps, your posts are a huge waste of bandwidth. Save the planet. STFU.
    1 point
  16. Can you find a graph or chart showing that covid deaths are down since the vax rollout? Can you find a graph or chart showing that there's a pandemic of the unvaccinated? Or that there was one at some point? Or even that unvaxed deaths are disproportionately high? You'll babble from now to kingdom come about what you believe without ever providing a shred of evidence, so you have no room to talk. OMG, really? You think that people who have been farming for generations, or went to places like Texas A & M, don't know what the hell they're doing? Do governments know better? Like the gov't of Sri Lanka, for example? You should probably provide a cite or shut up now, but my guess is te babbling will continue unabated. Understatement of the century. FYI the plural of unsubstantiated anecdotes isn't facts.
    1 point
  17. We can have some but we don't need to obey the environmentalist radicals who want to stop logging altogether. We also don't need a group of elites back in Ottawa, Montreal, and Toronto telling us in B.C. to protect more caribou by banning logging in more areas. They should butt out and keep their long noses to themselves. B.C. can decide itself what wildlife to protect and how much. That is B.C. jurisdiction, not federal.
    1 point
  18. I'll pass this along to the complaint department, no more hugs got ya...
    1 point
  19. Again, no. Canada hasn't limited fertilizers (setting goals to reduce usage, rather than mandates). Farmers around the world are generally some combination of careless or uneducated on how to properly apply fertilizers, seemingly figuring more = better when that's only not true, but also often harmful for soil quality and water tables. As an example, fertilizer use went up by 70% in Canada from 2005-2019, but not our output nor our farmed land area. So...once again, you've taken up the cry about bad Trudeau man or the Liberals or environmentalists, but you don't seem to know anything about it. What you probably also don't know is that leading the outrage over fertilizer reduction GOALS (again, not mandates) are lobby groups like Fertilizer Canada, who no doubt don't like the idea of farmers being taught to get better results with less fertilizer, or of large government grants/programs to educated them. Just a thought, if we're talking about "influence". ?‍♂️
    1 point
  20. We're not playing word games. We're showing the absurd leaps in logic you're taking from "influential people are members of (or even just attend) the WEF" to "the WEF has influence over everything and/or controls our governments". Yes, you did it again. Congratulations. You took a video from 2016 making predictions for 2030, and conflated it into a farcical claim that this is not only the WEF's formal agenda, but one that global leaders have adopted. A few problems: 1) Halfway to 2030 from that video's publication, global meat consumption is up. Since the WEF is so influential, and since this is its goal, I don't know how this is possible. 2) Especially after the Ukraine invasion, US power has been cemented and affirmed. Russia's been revealed as a hollow power. China's headed for demographic and economic crisis. If this is the WEF's agenda, (which makes no sense considering how many of the Davos men and women have benefited from US hegemony), then why isn't this playing out? 2) Most of the predictions don't even constitute goals. Western Values will be tested to breaking? That's what the WEF wants, or what some of its members predicted in 2016? We're going to print organs? That's their agenda, or an optimistic hope? Same with Mars? Think about these things before you jump on the bandwagon and start shouting angrily.
    1 point
  21. No. Roughly 3 million Canadians need a smack upside the head for being so stupid they've become a clear and present danger, not only to themselves. Hugs aren't what's called for.
    1 point
  22. He's in denial. We've already established that yes, these kooks have major influence on investment and governance
    1 point
  23. Thats why many countries are now limiting fertilizers ( see Canada) used for growing crops becasue of the Large carbon foot print , that is why in Europe they are now limiting the amount of live stock held by each farmer becasue apparently cow farts is bad for the environment, Ideas that have come out of WEF conferences... So now your confirming that these ideas are coming out of the WEF... i must say that is progress...All of this is coming out of a organization that does have a huge influence on global governments. It was one of the basic reason why they started this organization was it not...to have some influence on topics they wanted to push...
    1 point
  24. If ^this was TRUE, Trump FAILED to do his Constitutional DUTY and enforce that LAW. But the FACT is, Biden was implementing official US policy. Meanwhile, Trump ACTUALLY DEMANDED a QUID PRO QUO of an announcement of an "investigation" into Biden from Zelenskyy before Ukraine received Congressionally AUTHORIZED military aid. Conditioning an official obligation ON CAMPAIGN HELP is ILLEGAL EXTORTION. IN FACT FOREIGN CAMPAIGN HELP IS ILLEGAL. If Trump actually knew about illegal acts by Biden OR HIS SON, he could have had the DoJ INVESTIGATE, but what he really wanted with THE ANNOUNCEMENT for HIS CAMPAIGN BULLSHIT.
    1 point
  25. Klaus Schwab does have a thick German accent but if you listen to him speak English he clearly understands and means every word he says. When he brags about penetrating governments and being proud of it, there is no ambiguity. Don't get me started on George Soros.?
    1 point
  26. I am not sure who "invented" this crap, but the WEF is actively supporting/proposing it all, and they have more clout that they should.
    1 point
  27. Considering they carry all of the wealth, I you could look at it that way. Another way to look at it is that the top 20% own 86% of the USA's wealth, but only pay 73% of the taxes, shouldering the difference on the middle class instead.
    1 point
  28. Is anybody up on this ESG thing? If so explain it to me. Near as I can figure it stands for an Environmental, Social and Governance agenda amongst the big investment companies. Currently 30% of such companies have bought in. At the present time it seems more voluntary but there's a push to make reporting mandatory. That seems to be the current trend. So who gets the big money for investments will be decided somewhere by somebody or some thing and all seeking investment opportunities will submit to mandatory monitoring. Have too many lights on? Getting sued by a tranny? Not submitting to authority with acceptable vigor? No cash for you. Or at least that's the direction it's going. My big question on it is how long before it filters down to the rest of us? How long before the money and other managers of your life such as banks and electric companies are managing your money and activities based on something like your ESG score? Apparently if you ask the question you're a tin foiler requiring pariah status from great tolerant thinkers like herb and Mikey. So what? These sorts of question need to be asked by the open minded.
    1 point
  29. I imagine you would favour a wealth tax ?
    1 point
  30. Fauci email intercepts on lab origin "Pond added that there was no data then, and there is no data now, that would definitively indicate that a lab origin like the one contemplated in “Proximal Origin” is not at least plausible." Jan. 19, 2023
    1 point
  31. Good grub: why we might be eating insects soon | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) They certainly have mentioned the idea of the people eating bugs in order to save the planet.
    1 point
  32. My kid is pretty sure that magic is real and that one day his wand will work if he waves it just the right way. We have sort of the same arrangement: he'll let me know when he makes some progress.
    1 point
  33. It's in a garage next to a "sports car" but needs to be vetted.
    1 point
  34. Or maybe it's a case of "fools seldom differ".
    1 point
  35. So, despite the complete lack of evidence, you continue to believe claims made by certain people. You've pre-determined that there's an unsupported "truth" out there and you're just waiting to see if it somehow "prevails," despite no reason to expect it to do so. So, basically a weird religion. You're gonna believe it passionately, regardless of the facts in evidence. And are you seriously asking why I, or others, would vocally oppose the effort to undermine and even end fair and free elections? It's hard to imagine that is a sincere question. It's sort of like asking why one would oppose termites instead of just ignoring them. They oppose them because they don't want the house to collapse.
    1 point
  36. When I vote by mail I’m able to look up the status of my ballot to ensure that it was received and counted. Here’s the thing: Your election denial is not based on fact, it is based on pure conspiracy and conjecture. “Ahh! But the ballots could have been lost, the machines could have been hacked, aliens could have contaminated the drinking water, etc etc” You have chosen to believe in a conspiracy theory. Of course there’s no way for us to disprove your belief in pure fantasy, but that’s all it is. It is make-believe. “If I win the election, I won. Otherwise, we’ll all pretend I won.” Your belief system is that you cannot possibly lose an election, but your side has been losing more than you’ve been winning. Every time we ask you for proof of your statements, your answer is that it’s just around the corner, the truth is out there, the Kraken will be released. It’s all BS that you’ve bought into and it is not going to get your people elected.
    1 point
  37. It's too bad that this isn't actually true, like so many of your other sources. The UK is no longer offering boosters to healthy people under 50 because, as they say, the health risks aren't especially high, the community at this point has some herd immunity and because the elderly are fully vaccinated and as protected as they can be. Don't listen to common sense or anyone else though. Just go with your garbage-web conspiracy-confirming headlines.
    1 point
  38. Serious question, are you actually waiting, and if so, what for? Like Trump's election cases, Lake was basically laughed out of court the first time around. That doesn't seem to have shaken your faith. When she's laughed out again on appeal, what, if anything will that mean to you? Are you looking for facts, or just rooting for a team no matter what?
    1 point
  39. They are not making sound statements, finding suspicion behind every decision ... but only because they read something somewhere that told them that something is suspicious. There are millions of decisions being made that effect them every day but they post about very specific and strange ones. I'm guilty of engaging with them for entertainment value, but these posters should really be starved of attention herbie. There are better things to talk about than someone's delusions, copied and pasted from a bot site.
    1 point
  40. 1 point
  41. I just clued in the moonshine and eyeball may be the same dude
    1 point
  42. But if you wanna use it in a sentence, it goes something like this: "TNI, aka the Global Disinformation Cabal News Network, finally stopped censoring information about the BSL4 lab in May of 2021, 17 months into covid. Your CBC tax dollars only go so far."
    1 point
  43. Thank you for this thoughtful post. It's refreshing to read good, well thought out posts. ?
    1 point
  44. Thank you for a well thought out post. Seems you've put more thought, effort and research into it than what we are used to from folks like Moonbox or Eyeball.. That's a CoNsPIRaCYYYy ThEOrY
    1 point
  45. 12 you say.... Wow. And your Heritage.org citation... it cites 1412 individual instances of voter fraud (doesn't say if the were left or right) of which 1219 were caught and prosecuted, proving the system works. It's funny, the more you post, the stupider you look.
    1 point
  46. Thank you for finally admitting your post is pointless, halfwit.
    1 point
  47. I made an honest mistake, i admitted i was wrong what is it you want....This mistake however changes nothing else about my criticisms of the WEF. I have been questioning WEF policies, it is you that have swept the entire post under the table, becasue you find their policies Normal , perfectly normal... we have already establish the WEF has major influence around the globe, with global leaders and their cabinet members. Or maybe i got it all wrong maybe they go for the food and entertainment...You seem to suggest they are trying to make me eat bugs...and that is just retarded...and yet it is one of the WEF objectives why would they put it in their platform if it was not.... Silly i know... what about no one having any property, the state owns it all want something you rent it and it is delivered... no homes, no cars, no personal property, how's that work for you? Does this practice sound familiar. I know it is normal ideology right, feeds right in there with other Canadians ideology...like our entire economy is based on consumer demand thats out the window i guess, once again nothing scary here relax Armyguy everything is going to be OK... On the good side i won't have to worry about what to wear, , what to eat, where to live, what to drive, car insurance, it is all going to be provided by the state... the same state that can not even give us proper health care, look after the elderly, provide us with a decent security apparatus, well anything really to do with running a country...Nothing to worry about, it is never going to happen... and yet WEF already has polices that we are tabling or that have been tried already, Carbon tax how is that working, just transition, the new one, have you read the latest report on job losses this is going to destroy..it is in the millions... Jack Mintz: A 'just transition' out of energy? Ask the people of Hanna about that (msn.com) These are ideas being pushed by the WEF, do you see any of them being any good ? name one, who am I'm kidding your not going to read this far...
    1 point
  48. Perhaps this is an old report. The global death toll is 6.7 million so far. With what is happening in China, that number may increase significantly. And anyone who is unconcerned about the flu doesn't have a grasp of history. The flu pandemic after the Great War killed more people than the war.
    1 point
  49. It actually makes a lot of sense, knowing that the FBI was spying on him and his guests.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...