Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/27/2023 in all areas

  1. Yes you are twisting words around as you see fit, how about using them in the same context as i was... Just minutes ago you refused they even existed, now they are just predictions, predictions on how they want to see the world in 2030... why even put them out there if they were so far out there... is that an act that normal organization put out there, or is it just to feed the theories you talk about...Cause it adds nothing to their credibility... Are you denying there is not one global leader that has not adopted any of the WEF ideas or programs...Justin has been copying them for a while now, and just down south has brought in the same type of programs under the same names. And yes i would say he is an idio* as well. WOW meat consumption is up, would have nothing to do with there being more people on the planet...and how do you explain what is happening in Europe right now with restricting how many farm animals they can process, becasue of COW FAR*S... This is how our conversation typical end...you shouting me or anyone that has a difference of opinion down, then directing them to STF* and accuse them of shouting from the roof tops, i think if you read any of my posts thats not what i am doing. at all. .. you just can not help yourself, and can not believe someone can have a different opinion...or interest...
    3 points
  2. You’re describing the scary overreach that has become ubiquitous in government and organizations in Canada today. It’s put a chill on free speech because everyone is afraid of being canceled, losing their jobs and reputations, etc. Canada has dropped down in freedom rankings for these reasons. We are increasingly told what we should think and how we should live in top-down totalitarian fashion. Anyone who has studied history should know where this attack on free thinking leads. We can refer to the Spanish Inquisition, McCarthyism, the various purges in communist and fascist countries. Disagreement on matters of opinion has become grounds for mistreatment by employers, media, etc. I don’t know exactly when this got out of control in recent years, but the pandemic response certainly heightened the situation. It always starts for “good” reasons: ending racism, communism, sexism, public health emergencies, environmental catastrophe, etc. Having free exchange and debate of ideas suddenly became misinformation, conspiracy, and so on. The shift against freedom today is supported by cutting edge surveillance, data collection, and enforcement systems. That’s why we should be highly critical of new centralized controls, such as digital state currencies. Government and big businesses are working closely together like in the days of the fascist regimes to make sure citizens follow the path of “good” behaviour.
    3 points
  3. KXL was delayed a year by Barry. The Donald approved it all as soon as he took office. Biden killed it finally as soon as he took office. I didn't say this was a new battle...clown-boy...I said in 2012 they...you...were not actively squelching the oil industry. Clown-boy...
    3 points
  4. Given the clear grab for power that took place during covid and the overreaction in the form of unproven and unscientific NPIs and the desire to re-shape the world for now a climate "crisis", is it completely irrational to suspect that the interventions and grabs for authoritarian power for the climate "crisis" will be any different? They want everyone driving electric vehicles - which few can afford - and want everyone on digital IDs for easy tracking of locations and carbon footprints. So, some can sense a time coming, very quickly, where we are confined to a 15-Minute radius of your home, and if you try to drive further, your car shuts down and your digital ID both reports you and takes money directly from your account to fine you. Governments WILL have that ability, that is a fact. The question is - will they? Some say that given the excesses, authoritarianism and overreactions to covid, it shows their hand. So far, the only rebuttal I've heard is "Oh, for gawd's sake, they'd never do that to us." Except they just did. And they loved every minute of it.
    3 points
  5. A Pfizer employee, and a high up one at that makes some startling admissions. And there is even a bit of humour in it when the man in question brings up the diversity of the camera crew!? I was wondering if this guy was actually working for Pfizer and apparently he is. Was Jordon Trishton Walker a Pfizer Executive? - USSA News | The Tea Party's Front Page. Who says we can't have a laugh when we hear news stories?
    2 points
  6. I think i have apologized enough for my over sight, time to let it go... Now we are into playing word games, Yes the WEF is a forum, made up of some very influential people, who according to your suggestions they are not very influential at all... which is why our government has used dozens of their ideas, ya no influence at all....And i did not point out a singular agenda, i originally pointed out dozens...including a WEF web sight that has 8 to 10 items they promote, not some 4 Chan site... and you have yet to look at, makes me think this conversation is going exactly where all our conversations go round and round until i get dizzy....It is easy to sit back and tell the world they are full of shit, but you have not provided one single piece of evidence to back your claim...instead your follow your own moto and deny deny deny... And just as a side note, not once have i promoted this topic as a conspiracy theory, what i have said countless times was the topic interests me and i want to follow it, and what i posted was what i thought was strange or unusual... you seem to think those items i did post are normal behavior... Beware this is not a Chan4 theory...it is an actual WEF U tube video... I found the video becauase some of you are having issues with reading... n a promotional video, the World Economic Forum summarizes the eight predictions in the following statements: People will own nothing. Goods are either free of charge or must be lent from the state. The United States will no longer be the leading superpower, but a handful of countries will dominate. Organs will not be transplanted but printed. Meat consumption will be minimized. Massive displacement of people will take place with billions of refugees. To limit the emission of carbon dioxide, a global price will be set at an exorbitant level. People can prepare to go to Mars and start a journey to find alien life. Western values will be tested to the breaking point.. 8 predictions for the world in 2030 | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) Whoops did it again... these must be fake news
    2 points
  7. 2 points
  8. That is not the case that's been discussed in this topic. You say something you think without any association to your employer, never mentioning them from you home, during your free time. Next morning the employer runs a "tribunal" on the grounds that it may have affected their "reputation" and fires you. That would be clearly, a) arbitrary dismissal, and you should be able to sue the employer, including damages for violating your constitutional rights; b) a gross violation of the constitutional rights. But wait, there's more. Who would be the employer here, in most cases no other than the government itself. Governments in violation of constitutional rights? So should they be allowed to use those pads, "professional associations" to do the same job on their behalf? The solution is easy, define jurisdictions clearly and specifically: only clear professional misconduct, in direct execution of professional duties is in the jurisdiction of "associations" and "tribunals". And for everything else, for overstepping jurisdiction even by a half a step or inch, their a..es can (and should be) sued off, that time sure, for damaging reputations, exemplary damages for overstepping authority all of that. Only this way the society can make "because we can" folk learn because they will always come to believe that yes, they can and try it again. Persistently, tirelessly and regularly. That's a fact, nothing to discuss here, proven, certified and stamped by history.
    2 points
  9. OMG get off your high horse. Were you right about something for once in your life and now you can't let it go? I can't even believe some of you guys didn't change your usernames again after all the things you said about covid that turned out to be just as stupid as they sounded.
    2 points
  10. 'On the Origin of the Deadliest Pandemic in 100 Years' . . . . . Elaine Dewar. Excellent book . . . gives the timeline, dates, places, and names.
    2 points
  11. 2 points
  12. Good god, planned cities are not a new thing in much of the world and none of them are ghettos. You really need to get a grip.
    2 points
  13. Just because the thread title says something, does not make it true. The source of your article? Fox News. Yeah, believe them to tell you honestly that they crushed their competitors.
    2 points
  14. Thank you for speaking truth in a time where down is up, up is down, left is right... It's refreshing to see there's still people with common sense
    1 point
  15. You obviously don't know what is going on. Quebec does receive special favour in every area and has soveriegnty in the area of species at risk as well. "For example, Quebec does not participate in the development of Canada-wide policies and mechanisms for the conservation of species at risk, and as such, will not implement the proposed Pan-Canadian Approach. Quebec intends to work in complementarity with the federal government in setting priorities for the recovery of species in precarious situations, within already existing mechanisms." Overview of the Pan-Canadian approach to transforming Species at Risk conservation in Canada - Canada.ca
    1 point
  16. Where did I refuse what "existed"? Quote me. They're predictions, and they were labeled as predictions. They weren't labeled as goals. They weren't labeled or even promoted as agendas. Because that's all the WEF does! ? They talk about stuff, share ideas, theorize, debate etc. The Danish author (a nobody) who wrote "own nothing and be happy" has gone on the record that she wasn't promoting anything, and that her article was only an attempt to start a discussion of the pros and cons of ongoing technological/economic/societal changes she was seeing. It was a nothing-burger and promptly forgotten until some 4chan incel dug it up and started meming about it, where it went viral. The conspiracy circus then decided that this article/video from a bunch of forgotten nobodies was THE agenda for the WEF, which has been amplified by every gullible conservative online ever since despite the nonsensical leaps in logic you need to make to believe it. None of this makes any sense whatsoever when you consider that the WEF is just a once-a-year event, but once you've jumped down the rabbit-hole and decided instead that it's a powerful organization pulling the strings of government around the world year-round, you can convince yourself of anything I guess.
    1 point
  17. Even at 150 Mbps, your posts are a huge waste of bandwidth. Save the planet. STFU.
    1 point
  18. Can you find a graph or chart showing that covid deaths are down since the vax rollout? Can you find a graph or chart showing that there's a pandemic of the unvaccinated? Or that there was one at some point? Or even that unvaxed deaths are disproportionately high? You'll babble from now to kingdom come about what you believe without ever providing a shred of evidence, so you have no room to talk. OMG, really? You think that people who have been farming for generations, or went to places like Texas A & M, don't know what the hell they're doing? Do governments know better? Like the gov't of Sri Lanka, for example? You should probably provide a cite or shut up now, but my guess is te babbling will continue unabated. Understatement of the century. FYI the plural of unsubstantiated anecdotes isn't facts.
    1 point
  19. 1 point
  20. We can have some but we don't need to obey the environmentalist radicals who want to stop logging altogether. We also don't need a group of elites back in Ottawa, Montreal, and Toronto telling us in B.C. to protect more caribou by banning logging in more areas. They should butt out and keep their long noses to themselves. B.C. can decide itself what wildlife to protect and how much. That is B.C. jurisdiction, not federal.
    1 point
  21. Again, no. Canada hasn't limited fertilizers (setting goals to reduce usage, rather than mandates). Farmers around the world are generally some combination of careless or uneducated on how to properly apply fertilizers, seemingly figuring more = better when that's only not true, but also often harmful for soil quality and water tables. As an example, fertilizer use went up by 70% in Canada from 2005-2019, but not our output nor our farmed land area. So...once again, you've taken up the cry about bad Trudeau man or the Liberals or environmentalists, but you don't seem to know anything about it. What you probably also don't know is that leading the outrage over fertilizer reduction GOALS (again, not mandates) are lobby groups like Fertilizer Canada, who no doubt don't like the idea of farmers being taught to get better results with less fertilizer, or of large government grants/programs to educated them. Just a thought, if we're talking about "influence". ?‍♂️
    1 point
  22. We're not playing word games. We're showing the absurd leaps in logic you're taking from "influential people are members of (or even just attend) the WEF" to "the WEF has influence over everything and/or controls our governments". Yes, you did it again. Congratulations. You took a video from 2016 making predictions for 2030, and conflated it into a farcical claim that this is not only the WEF's formal agenda, but one that global leaders have adopted. A few problems: 1) Halfway to 2030 from that video's publication, global meat consumption is up. Since the WEF is so influential, and since this is its goal, I don't know how this is possible. 2) Especially after the Ukraine invasion, US power has been cemented and affirmed. Russia's been revealed as a hollow power. China's headed for demographic and economic crisis. If this is the WEF's agenda, (which makes no sense considering how many of the Davos men and women have benefited from US hegemony), then why isn't this playing out? 2) Most of the predictions don't even constitute goals. Western Values will be tested to breaking? That's what the WEF wants, or what some of its members predicted in 2016? We're going to print organs? That's their agenda, or an optimistic hope? Same with Mars? Think about these things before you jump on the bandwagon and start shouting angrily.
    1 point
  23. No. Roughly 3 million Canadians need a smack upside the head for being so stupid they've become a clear and present danger, not only to themselves. Hugs aren't what's called for.
    1 point
  24. Thanks for the constructive opinion, I and my staff will take it under advisement for future posts..., I was not aware that the you were made one of the forums content moderators, and judges of characters...once again i will instruct myself and my staff to be more considerate of your sensitivities. For future exchanges, i might want to add, i am here on this forum for my education, (apparently i need a lot of it,) i am not here to make friends or take long showers with members of the left or those that think they are in the center. I try to keep an open mind about most topics, but being told what topics i can or will be judge on is nothing I am interested in.
    1 point
  25. Klaus Schwab does have a thick German accent but if you listen to him speak English he clearly understands and means every word he says. When he brags about penetrating governments and being proud of it, there is no ambiguity. Don't get me started on George Soros.?
    1 point
  26. I am not sure who "invented" this crap, but the WEF is actively supporting/proposing it all, and they have more clout that they should.
    1 point
  27. Considering they carry all of the wealth, I you could look at it that way. Another way to look at it is that the top 20% own 86% of the USA's wealth, but only pay 73% of the taxes, shouldering the difference on the middle class instead.
    1 point
  28. Right? How does the topic of communism enter into a discussion of free speech? So random...
    1 point
  29. There's a wide chasm between mentioning the idea and potential benefits of bug farming, vs an actual plan or even a desire to replace traditional farming, especially in places where food is plentiful like Canada and Europe. Anyone with an ounce of common sense would understand that pushing bugs onto our plates and taking away our BBQs is not happening. As I said, this was "mentioned" on the WEF website back in 2016, and for some reason eating the bugs, owning nothing and being happy didn't become THE AGENDA until it was dug up and went viral in 2021.
    1 point
  30. No. There's a faction on both sides of this issue that can't let go of the Pandemic. On one side you have the #COVIDisntOver crowd who are perfectly happy with masking as good public health going forward and on the other side you have people, like member Goddess, who believe it's the vaccine that has caused the excess death we've seen, not COVID, and anything that says otherwise is a conspiracy from the WEF Cabal.
    1 point
  31. This sort of natter would make more sense if you could actually tell me what I'm wrong about, coherently make your point, or even attempt to answer a challenge to your argument. What are we specifically doing to "squelch fossil fuels" today that we weren't doing 10 years ago, or even 3 years ago, before the WEF became the newest incarnation on the Illuminati?
    1 point
  32. Good grub: why we might be eating insects soon | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) They certainly have mentioned the idea of the people eating bugs in order to save the planet.
    1 point
  33. Gosh I think you should give it up. Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
    1 point
  34. Gosh I guess if qualify the argument as "actively squelching" (whatever that actually means) you can portray it however you want. What, specifically, qualifies as "actively squelching?" ?.
    1 point
  35. The US DoD has said that it almost certainly came from the Wuhan lab and the gain of function work that Fauci was funding. The only reason we can't be 100% sure is because the Chinese have refused to release information.
    1 point
  36. They are not making sound statements, finding suspicion behind every decision ... but only because they read something somewhere that told them that something is suspicious. There are millions of decisions being made that effect them every day but they post about very specific and strange ones. I'm guilty of engaging with them for entertainment value, but these posters should really be starved of attention herbie. There are better things to talk about than someone's delusions, copied and pasted from a bot site.
    1 point
  37. 1 point
  38. I just clued in the moonshine and eyeball may be the same dude
    1 point
  39. Next they’ll try to keep us from leaving the country. Oh wait, some memories seem to be returning…
    1 point
  40. Jeezuz K Riest there's a lot of people dead set against doing anything that might make things better. It's only you that have little puppet strings in your brain that people can 'control' and exercise 'power' over and see plots everywhere. Normal people don't.
    1 point
  41. I want to present 3 pieces of data which continue to build the case that this FDA, under Peter Marks, is acting recklessly with its push to boost, in perpetuity, 18 year old men who had COVID19. This week, internal emails show Marion Gruber, former head of FDA vaccine science frustrated with Marks. She specifically highlighted the myocarditis issue. Myocarditis appears to occur at least 1/10k with boosters, and subclinical troponin elevation is likely 100 times as high (based on 2 studies). This concern was ignored. FDA under Marks has changed the date Pfizer is required to turn in postmarket safety data. From Dec to June. This is the study to look for troponin in young men. These data were needed in 2021— their continued delay is catastrophic. If the rate of myocarditis is 1/10k hospitalized (consistent with Sharff’s estimate for the last booster), how can the benefit outweigh this in a 16 year old man who had COVID? He does not have even an absolute risk of 1 in 10k hospitalization from reinfection. This is now a harmful intervention until proven otherwise. Links in article: Peter Marks' FDA is Playing Games with Young Men's Health & Maximizing Pfizer's Profits (substack.com)
    1 point
  42. Thank you for this thoughtful post. It's refreshing to read good, well thought out posts. ?
    1 point
  43. Yes it was published 3 years ago so pandemic was just getting going. Also this person is a very old retired researcher in agricultural biology. It's fine, but I'm already leery of academics who post in other fields after reading Jordan Peterson's ridiculous assessment of climate science. Overall it's a weird idea to say let's look back at the pandemic to see what we can do better, and so here's a paper that talks about it.. from 2020.
    1 point
  44. Imagine an Edmonton of two million people where you can live inside a “15-minute district,” with easy access to everything you need by any mode of transportation. Restaurants, parks, grocery stores and retail stores all within reach inside your own bubble within the larger city. For those constant whiners that can't even read and whose minds are a conspiracy of their own. Nowhere does it say you can't own a car or your not allowed to visit your daughter, those are delusions of your mental impairment. Not any great conspiracy, this has been planning policy in many places for decades under the name 'neighbourhoods'.
    1 point
  45. 12 you say.... Wow. And your Heritage.org citation... it cites 1412 individual instances of voter fraud (doesn't say if the were left or right) of which 1219 were caught and prosecuted, proving the system works. It's funny, the more you post, the stupider you look.
    1 point
  46. Thank you for finally admitting your post is pointless, halfwit.
    1 point
  47. Perhaps this is an old report. The global death toll is 6.7 million so far. With what is happening in China, that number may increase significantly. And anyone who is unconcerned about the flu doesn't have a grasp of history. The flu pandemic after the Great War killed more people than the war.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...