Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/28/2022 in Posts

  1. This is about bringing America's problems here and calling them our own.
    2 points
  2. They merely recite the opinions that they were told to. I don't think that their memory is an issue at all or they could be reminded of what the definition of a vaccine used to be, and/or what the original covid "vaccine" claims were. You can put it all in black and white, right in front of their faces, complete with with videos of Fauci et al saying those things, and they don't "remember" squat, they just regurgitate the newest vax propaganda. It's either next-level ignorance/denial or outright lying. In either case it has nothing to do with memory, science or facts. You're 100% correct. I'd argue that even if, for the sake of argument, we all just agreed that the vaccine offers 20% better results for the people who are in the covid death demographic, which is possible, it's still an absolute certainty that it absolutely doesn't do anything which justifies mandatory vaxxing of infants, pre-schoolers, school-aged children, or anyone else for that matter. If it helps in some way, then it's obviously an attractive option for the people who are at risk and it's worth the chance of side-effects for them. That's where you're gonna hit a brick wall lol. If there's one thing that vaxtards are certain of it's their own moral superiority, facts be damned. That point has been hammered home to them for almost two years now and it's impossible for CTV/CBC/CNN drones to let go of their emotional beliefs.
    2 points
  3. Remembrance Day is a day to celebrate the sacrifices of our veterans. I don't think it's particularly political. My grandfathers served in WWII. The one I knew was a true Canadian bad@ss, i've never really met anyone like him. That generation were raised in the depression and then came of age overseas in warfare or praying their brothers & friends & classmates came home. My grandmother kept a scrapbook of newspaper clippings of the obituaries of boys she knew in her neighborhood and in her school that were killed in the war, she showed it to me when we were cleaning our her house when she was moving into her retirement home. That really hit home for me. Even though my grandfather served he refused to take a dime from the Legion, or use his veteran status to get any kind of discounts or freebies. He served with true honour. Imagine if our politicians served their country with that kind of integrity? They won't even put their jobs on the line for this country, let alone their lives. That said, I don't begrudge anyone that takes those things if they also do it honestly. I think the vets who see real action and put their lives on the line should be set up for life by our gov. Treat them like the heroes and martyrs they are as long as they serve with honour. The recruitment problem we have tells us a lot of things, but the bottom line is that young men and women don't want to serve and defend this country like they used to. Apparently even some of our vets even turn their backs on this country ; ) This country has failed them and failed you.
    1 point
  4. no, I favour disbanding the entire Canadian Forces Canada totally relies on America for its national defence Canada should stop wasting $20 billion a year on the pretense that it actually defends itself
    1 point
  5. No. In the meantime every graph you've posted works just fine, that the unvaccinated, all 14% of you, account for around half the deaths. It takes 86% of us to account for the rest. Take your last graph for example, Total deaths 21861 110061 vaccinated =50.1% 10800 unvaccinated = 49.1% For some reason you don't believe or can't make sense of our own source and yet I'm the idiot.
    1 point
  6. a frigate is not and never was an arm of a decision the purpose of a frigate by definition is simply to conduct patrol & escort duties at minimum, every navy requires frigates, as the basic all purpose warship the submarine battle would have to be fought & won before you sent frigates into the area of operations Canada is never going to have nuclear submarines never mind that Canada could simply not afford them on the Canadian budget but the Americans will not allow Canada to have nuclear submarines the last time Canada even toyed with the idea, the Americans flat out told Canada that they couldn't have them the main reason being, America is using Canadian claimed waters for SSN operations in the Arctic the Americans don't want Canadian submarines up there snooping on what they are doing Canada is not a trusted partner at the that level of strategic operations and America disputes Canada's claim to the Northwest Passage, invoking Freedom of Navigation therein F-35 Lightning II is Canada's best option, the 5th Generation fighter is the most bang Canada can get for the buck it's a turnkey solution, designed to be plug & play for allies, so ready made for Canada and aerial bombing is actually Canada's forte since the Second World War, Canada has sought to bomb the enemy, in order to keep Canadian boots off the ground for as long as possible since Canadian Confederation cannot actually withstand the strain of heavy casualties Sic Itur Ad Astra
    1 point
  7. I give money to the cadets at the liquor store but I don't wear a Poppy, nor do I attend Remembrance Day parades anymore in terms of supporting veterans, if there is a brother who needs my help, I will come to his aid in the breach whatever is in my power, I will bring those means to bear upon request or alarm
    1 point
  8. You don't think people target shoot with hand guns? It's an Olympic sport. Once the current crop of Canadian shooters retire, there will be no more Canadians competing in that discipline. No one "needs" golf clubs or skis either. No one "needs" high powered cars and they kill a lot more people than legal hand guns. God help us when people like you get to decide what others can use based on what you "need".
    1 point
  9. What do you think Trudeau means when he says everyone get the jabs so we don't have to give restrictions like last time? If someone said to me, "Eat this apple so I don't have to punch you in the face." wouldn't that be a threat? What part of this is difficult for you to understand?
    1 point
  10. So what you're saying is that 14% of Canadians still account for nearly half the deaths in Canada. Yes that's right but this is only significant to you because you insist on also believing that 14 and 86 are equal. Once again, 14% of Canadians still account for close to half of all deaths in Canada. ?
    1 point
  11. Hey, at work today, I've seen some women cutting half an inch of their hair and sharing it to our group chat in our Teams chats. It was so moving, and it sure will help liberate Iranian women from blood thirsty islamists. It sure showed them, right?
    1 point
  12. 1 point
  13. Is that what we learned? Trudeau, I suppose, was also responsible for China's zero-COVID policy and all of their factory shutdowns, right? He's why container ships were waiting days outside of major pacific ports, and why global oil prices have skyrocketed. Trudeau et al are the sole reason.... ??
    1 point
  14. Why don't you explain this assertion, West? Tell us how the bad man Trudeau caused all of the global supply chain disasters. ?
    1 point
  15. This is not something new, this goes back decades i mean the pandemic made this crystal clear to everyone, are we not smart enough to catch it then, or where consumers so hooked on cheaper goods. when we were importing oil form Arab countries, becasue we were not smart enough to build infra structure to span the country. shit we were not even smart enough to build refiners to refine our own bitumen instead shipped it to the states at record low prices and then purchased it back at full price when it was refined. it is like we designed our own down fall. or we are just not that smart.
    1 point
  16. I agree. I'm just trying to get you to recognize how hyperbole isn't helping your argument. Take that to heart, or don't. ?‍♂️
    1 point
  17. Nope and never will. A movie is for entertainment and not to use for factual discussion or argument. Retelling of historical events, visually, is done in documentaries. Movies are fiction, stories, that describes imaginary events and people. You never suggested a source, you quoted a movie... a Hollywood movie for gawd sake LOL I am thinking I know why you live in dreamland if you believe movies are real events (and facebook and tweets and ticktok).
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...