Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/04/2022 in all areas

  1. Why is the foreign influence exibited in the trucker's convoy and the rolling thunder protest so strong? Why are there American flags in a supposedly Canadian event? And Infidel Dog, "pursuit of happiness" is an American saying. The US is a great country but we are not Americans.
    2 points
  2. Seems to me that the unfocused bizarre reasons too many people in society have for being against abortion are the best argument there is for leaving the issue entirely up to a woman and her doctor.
    2 points
  3. Banning abortion will kill women, and help nobody.
    2 points
  4. You might have a point if you’re side wasn’t the side insisting that men can get pregnant. ? Regardless, abortion has never been a constitutional right. It’s never been codified. There’s a process for that, but none of its supporters have ever attempted it. Instead they’ve relied on an outdated, badly decided court decisions.
    2 points
  5. I really enjoy the lack of freedom and loss of my rights. I'm not allowed to vote or say anything about the government, and I find that pleasurable.
    2 points
  6. Good day for the rights of the unborn today and states rights. Roe Vs. Wade has been struck down making it up to the states to pass their own individual bills. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-overturn-roe-draft-leaked-draft-opinion-report On another note, seems a leftist activist is trying to stir up violence by leaking this
    1 point
  7. I know what Azovs are and I know what your MSM girlies all say. I don't believe a bloody word the media say anymore...and they've EARNED that disrespect! There's a Canadian journalist, Eva Bartlet. Give your brain some food for thought. And again...I'm not defending anyone. I'm defending what rings true to me.
    1 point
  8. With 100% agreement, like Kim's? You've got to be kidding. See, Mandy, the problem is not of rationalization. Since times immemorial and forgotten some people have come up with reasons and rationalizations why they should be entitled to rule (with perks associated with it, obviously) while others, not. And that's OK that's what we humans understand and do. The problem is that those ruled still need to agree to be ruled or there would conflicts, wars, revolutions not good for business generally. And that's why folks came up with the notion of democracy. Not just because they liked the word. Now, democracy does not have a single golden standard. Rather there's that elusive notion of democratic legitimacy basically that the majority and a large one sees the process as democratic and legitimate (note, not necessarily being that, by objective measure). And from that perspective there's no problem either, hard to argue that a very large majority in this country sees the system as legitimate. So be it. But there's a problem still. It's that the system is outdated, to the point of archaic; inefficient; inadequate and incapable of understanding and managing a complex modern society; closed and self-absorbed; isolated; entrenched; and entitled to the point of outrageous and obscene, and third world too, to mention. And that is a problem. History and evolution show us again and again that it can be a big problem without easy solutions. So just believing it and repeating same old over and over doesn't really solve problems, in evolution. Dinosaurs know it.
    1 point
  9. So the 95,000 abortions done in Canada were all due to rape, or could it be they were too lazy to use birth control measures, Your using this rape thing as your only go to, well aside from racism, which controls everything now, many states have reasonable caveats for abortion, such as the mother lives is in danger, the baby is abnormal or deformed, and rape. what they do not cover is we could not wait to get a rubber, or could not get a drive to the pharmacy She should have listened in sex ed class is what she should have done, or the parents should have explained birth control. this is not the family dog we are talking about, taking it out back and putting it down for some silly reason. it is a human life, that should at least be worthy of a conversation, and the procedure should be described in detail on what is going to happen to that life in her stomach.
    1 point
  10. That is the problem. I don't speak duck. ? You are wrong. MP's work long hours and decide whether or not to support legislation. Caucus meetings can be very contentious. Have you ever sat down with your MP to find out what she / he does? As I've said many times before, if your MP is not performing to your satisfaction, get a better one elected or run for parliament yourself. You say the money is so great. First, start saving $100K for your nomination and campaign. It will need to be money you won't get back. Quit your job or take a leave of absence about 18 months before the election and get out meeting people and knocking on doors in your riding. Find a really good campaign manager, someone who will keep you focused. Identify your support and get out the vote. Participate in our national sport. Or, you can stay home and complain that nobody will change things. Your choice. Cheers.
    1 point
  11. Myata, you continue to have problems using plain English. You are way above my level of education and I need you to talk down to me. To put it bluntly, I'm a bit thick, so could you maybe at least provide Englis sub-titles so I know what you are trying to communicate?
    1 point
  12. No loss here, but you seem to have problems grasping execution of complex projects. It begins with an investment, part(ies) that seek and prepared to put time and effort into the necessary change. Everything else is either literature or dreaming. And MP situation that I'm trying to bring to attention is one, but very clear indicator of a runaway political system absorbed and locked into itself with no relation to the reality of the broader society. No, it makes no sense to compare our citizen representatives to private CEOs and managers, even if in their shell they like to see it that way. As a citizen I don't need that and shouldn't be forced to pay for that; and attempts to force, impose such entrenched systems on the society always fail eventually, one way or another.
    1 point
  13. To me, the 12-week time limit makes sense because that’s when most women have natural miscarriages. Actually, most prefer not to announce they’re pregnant before the 3-month mark for this reason. Having an abortion in months 6-9 is an abomination; however, how many of these types of abortions are happening? I sure hope not many and believe they’re being used as propaganda to further the pro-life agenda. Planned Parenthood has been vilified to the point some people think of it as “satanic central”. I’m very skeptical of hyperbole and that’s exactly what this line of rhetoric is.
    1 point
  14. I'm surprised that you can even read. 1) If by "their own business reasons" you mean - they didn't want to lose their business, Sure thing flyer 2) The analogy was bang-on. You can pseudovax as much as you want and it doesn't offend anyone. Get a needle a day if you want, good for you. That means that covid can only kill you or put you in the ICU at worst. 4) If the vax was working then the case fatality rate in the US in the US would be lower than that of the rest of the world, because they had the vaxes longer than anyone else and they have more people vaxed than the global average. The CFR for the US is exactly equal to that of the entre rest of the world, right since the beginning of covid. 1.2% in the US, 1.2% for the entire rest of the world, right since the beginning of covid. 3) Saved the best for last. YES, YOU DO "TELL" PEOPLE WHAT TO DO. You're like one of the people in Nazi Germany who went along with all of the Nazis' propaganda and backed them every step of the way. People like you didn't get a job at the local gas chamber, but they were vocal supporters of said gas chamber. Re: the pseudovax - you go along with the vax pass, the discrimination, and you fervently support the government's use of force to vax people. You're one of the sheeple. Trudeau counts on people like you to get behind his idiotic propaganda and act like everything he does is ok when it's clearly not.
    1 point
  15. I’m tired of repeating the multiple violations of our Constitution that have taken place. If you don’t see them or believe there were breaches, that’s your right, but the conversation ends there. I would say that a government that plays loose with the Constitution will be imperilled politically eventually. The country is more divided than I’ve ever seen. I’m not so sure anymore about the value of Canada as a nation state if its sovereignty and constitution aren’t upheld. If too many Canadians feel this way, the federal government will have to change its ways. I’m doubtful that this government will do that.
    1 point
  16. Anyone who was born with testicles will produce around 8 billion potential humans in their lifetime. If you want to call not being forced to carry a blastocyst to term 'murder,' then we might as well call you a murder for all the lives YOU weren't forced to bring to term.
    1 point
  17. No that wouldn't be fine with me at all which is why I supported measures when I saw evidence of things like mass graves, traffic jams of ambulances arriving at hospitals and a medical emergency rapidly spreading around the planet. No, you were told and advised to think that. What came naturally to me was the early realization by March of 2020 that wherever the right-wing was determined to come unglued over the measures the pandemic would be far worse than it needed to be. I specifically pointed out that measures in the US in particular wouldn't stand a chance against "conservatives".
    1 point
  18. Democrats couldn't knock over a lemonade stand if their lives depended on it. They lose or abandon their power the way Republicans give up their marbles. Democrats lack the single-minded pagan ethos Republicans bring to politics which is ironic given the herd-like qualities they've successfully projected onto Democrats.
    1 point
  19. People who are pro choice aren't pro abortion. Lets get that straight to begin with.
    1 point
  20. They are not stupid questions when those being asked can never respond intelligently and with real answers as opposed to claiming it being a stupid question. I am here playing devils advocate to the doom and gloomers such as yourself. I bring insight and value and sometimes alternative and sometimes opposite points of view which should encourage discussion but instead, enrages single minded folks like you when someone disagrees with your point of view.
    1 point
  21. Gotta be Charest or brown who win for me I would listen then anyone else and it's a Trudeau vote for me
    1 point
  22. On the other hand and to be fair let's listen to the side of the argument Eyeball seems to prefer. So rational...
    1 point
  23. This is probably what a typical conversation huddled around a barrel fire at a convoy rally must sound like. You've all lost your marbles.
    1 point
  24. Abortion kills babies. That should weigh heavily in the debate.
    1 point
  25. Yes it will. Botched abortions killed many women before they became legal. Prior to Roe vs. Wade in the United States, more than 5,000 women per year were killed because of botched abortions.
    1 point
  26. Seems to me abortion is population control for people of color. Convince them the only way is to kill their baby. At one point my conscience was seared by leftists too. I'm so glad I woke up to the perversion of the left. I invite you to do the same
    1 point
  27. Your conscience is seared. You believe murdering babies isn't bad because they are "just a clump".
    1 point
  28. Lol, oh oh, somebody call the burn unit *nudge nudge* amiright?
    1 point
  29. The WHO, like the UN, are wokesters who will justify perversion for their own personal gain
    1 point
  30. Fingernail clippings??? Mable...you got issues. People...so the unborn babies are not people? Gee...racist and murderous. Rattle Rattle Rattle...
    1 point
  31. Abortion is an injustice. I'm surprised we still sacrifice children for wealth like they used to do to religion for a good crop year
    1 point
  32. I speak for protecting human rights. You speak for removing them. I think you’re the sad one.
    1 point
  33. Whatever it takes to justify murdering the innocent...
    1 point
  34. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1111 That's the law. If you think you can argue against this and win in the SCOTUS...go for it Mable. As for your idle comment about a tiny little shot...a heroin addict takes a tiny little shot...and the fentanyl in it...which came from the Chinese through Biden's open border...kill the addict. "MY BODY. MY DECISION." Isn't that the battle cry? As for you coward comment. Go get your crowbar. But remember...if I get it from you...
    1 point
  35. Your response is completely unacceptable and comes out of religious fanatism. I was asking if God exists and is supposedly so powerful why he doesn't intervene when a defenseless girl is being raped by Russian soldiers or an unarmed teenage Iranian being shot into his/her heart on the order of an islamic clergy? Your response clearly indicates that God is indeed indifferent when he has the power to stop it and he choose not to. If I had the super ability I would have wasted the murderers and rapists all over the world without hesitation.
    1 point
  36. I have two kids and six grand kids. Abortion has never been a personal issue in our family but that doesn't mean I have the right to dictate to others. I'm wondering what will happen when one of the whiter than white worthies who are peddling this has their daughter raped and made pregnant by a black man. Should she have to do what you or dad or grand dad says or should she be able to decide for herself?
    1 point
  37. The Texas law doesn't even make exceptions for rape or incest. Seems like the driving force behind this is mostly men. An issue all you self righteous guys will never have do deal with.
    1 point
  38. Are you one of those who say "protect the vulnerable" whenever the topic of masks, social distancing or restrictions come up,? Because if so, why would you object to measures taken to protect them?
    1 point
  39. Forcing women to do something they will never have to do is about men using women.
    1 point
  40. I fear no man, only God I would close with and destroy without any fear at all I would be too busy trying to execute the no fail mission to the Canadian standard to be afraid if I got killed, it would be a surprise yet I would go to the foot of the Lord serenely as we will all be together again, over the river, under the shade of the trees
    1 point
  41. Definitely in a twisted way access to financing has allowed Universities to charge obscene money for their courses. It would be unfair considering the millions of students who had to refinance their mortgages or the like just to pay down their debt. My wife had some debt from her days in Colorado and these guys are relentless. There really is no way out and if you don't want your life to be a living hell, pay off your student loans.
    1 point
  42. You keep beating around the bush and still no answer to my question with or without a "who".
    1 point
  43. It's just men claiming dominion over women's bodies like they have for millennia. Texas abortion law is a perfect example, the law itself sets people against each other.
    1 point
  44. The Democrats control the largest think tanks, the largest foundations, the universities, the media...did I leave anything out? And the Deep State, the unelected government, is mostly controlled by them. Doesn't help the GOP are a bunch of political nitwits who get outmaneuvered by the Democrats constantly. The 2020 election was stolen and the GOP just stood there and let it happen.
    1 point
  45. Oh Dad! you must be close to 90 if I'm your 'son.' You miss that DeSantis is definitely against the personal freedom of gay people as well as most non-Evangelical Christians. I know my politics. Still don't know your acronym, "TDS", by the way. The nefarious intent exists contrary to the fact that you are simply not sufficiently well versed in the essential political philosophy and manuevoring by those who believe in extremes. The BILL falsely bases its assumptions that there is some intentional conspiracy to make pedophiles or other misfits under the smokescreen of "CRT" as an excuse. Disney refused to respect this precisely for those who are 'weird' by some stereotypical standards that include gay people especially. They believe that teachers are 'normalizing' the acceptance of one to BE 'gay' for instance, as well as to anything non-traditionally Christian.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...