All Activity
- Past hour
-
Disgusting Erica Kirk Attack
John Johnston replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
-
California Election Fraud Charges Coming
Nationalist replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Hilarious! Its already coming out. 🤣 -
I have a 25 dollar a month Koodo plan for my iPhone. When I purchase a 25 dollar voucher it costs me 29.95 even at the Koodo Telus outlet in Jackson square Hamilton Ontario. Then instead of Koodo removing 25 dollars from my wallet, they remove 29 dollars. I’m on a 25 dollar plan which winds up costing me $33.95 in total every month. Very deceptive. I have a screenshot of the receipt I got at the Koodo Telus Jackson square location in which I was also charged $1.50 epin service charge when apparently there isn’t suppose to be a service charge when you purchase the voucher at a Koodo - Telus location. That just happened to me today. Telus has been removing 29 dollars from my wallet for over a year on a 25 dollar plan. Tell me what you think. love Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist David Jeffrey Spetch Ontario Canada Ps. Be good, be strong!
-
Why Are NGOs Still Operating?
Nationalist replied to Nationalist's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
1. You lose. 2 a, b & c. Reasonable to destroy the family unit. What a disgusting and disturbing thing to admit. Yes it probably was a statement/policy made in anger. An angry BLM traitor. No bullshit. https://thepostmillennial.com/blm-toronto-leader-believes-white-people-are-sub-human-calls-them-genetic-defects As for Affirmative Action...the SCOTUS disagrees with you. Sorry Charlie. -
Bill Essayli (Republican, Muslim) says he will be bringing election fraud charges as soon as Cali is certified. I know, I know. The left is going to say they haven't seen proof. But they don't advertise the proof before the charges. He says he needs the elections certified to bring the charges. Let's see what the scope of the charges are and if this can invalidate an election. To do that, there would have to be proof of whom the fraud benefited. Wiki bio
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
They did not use stand your ground as a defense it was self defense. He didn't have the right to be there. It was the opposing teams tent which is like a locker room. He started the altercation by not leaving a place he didn't belong and instead starting running his mouth and calling everyone b1tches. He had a knife which was prohibited by the school. He can't claim fear when he literally was daring them to hit him. If you are scared you leave. He had his hand on the knife ready to go if Austin touched him. Austin didnt punch him he gave him a light shove. In Texas you cannot provoke the attack.
- Today
-
Why Are NGOs Still Operating?
eyeball replied to Nationalist's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
1. Probably not and yes pfft captures my sense nicely. 2a. Sounds reasonable. 2b. Sounds like someone's angry opinion. 2c. Sounds like bullshit. As for DEI, there is no new modern movement it's been with us for decades and is aka affirmative action. The reasons for which has hardly budged in the US and seems to be going thru a renaissance. So stop it and get with the program. -
From the stupid cultist: "So what if she has zero evidence, zero witnesses, can't name what year it allegedly happened, and the judge blocked the jury from finding out that she was caught lying during her deposition? He's guilty because jurors in a 94% Dem area thought he was 51% likely to be guilty." Also from the same stupid cultist: "So what if there were a bunch of witnesses who saw it, it was his knife, it had his fingerprints on it, and he said that he did it? He's innocent, and it will take a crooked judge and jury to convict him!" Congrats on beating all the odds, and finding a new low to sink to. Even Kamala "I blow old dudes to get political appointments" Harris looks up to you now. Facts: He brought a lethal weapon with him to a place that he knew he wasn't supposed to go to he had a plan to use it on someone instigated a situation where he could use it he used - what he knew to be lethal force - in response to a shove FYI if you make a plan to kill someone, and then go through with your plan kill that person, that's "pre-meditated murder". It's even pre-meditated murder if you plan a crime, bring a gun but only mean to use it to coerce people to do something, and then kill someone with the gun during the commission of your crime. If you plan any crime, and then kill someone during your crime, that's 1st degree murder, murder one, pre-meditated murder, what have you. In the US you have carte blanche to defend yourself, but you aren't allowed to plan a crime and kill someone during its execution.
-
CdnFox started following Karmelo Anthony is going to get Murder 1 prepare for the riots
