All Activity

Meech Lake wasn't killed by the Feds.

BTW... HEY @Michael Hardner... Is this impressive? Should you, of all people...be condemning this trash as culture war trash? Come on Mike. Where's your high and mighty condemnation? I've told you countless times...the Libbies started this...and we're gonna fckin' finish it...by THEIR RULES. Enjoy the chaos.

You do not address the problems and you try to picture them as "politicians' fiefdom". Therefore, YOU ARE the problem. Fix the problems and referendum on seperations won't occur.

When you accuse someone, at least make your point. What do you think you have proven? You have proven MY POINT. If the NO win by a small margin, you expect the losers to shut up and accept defeat. But if the YES win, you expect civil war. You call that wisdom? I call that snotty despot. If you think the federal can be repaired, then fix it instead of removing the people's right to choose for their future. Unless you have this deep desire to remove from us any remorse of kiling you in a your civil war. "The "No" option carried by a margin of 54,288 and that wasn't enough for a lot of separatists." Says who? Did any seperatists did engage Quebec into seperation despite the results? Nope! As long as the status quo will be going on, separatists are legitimated to bring the question on seperation. Assume your mediocrity. Regarding the instances requiring more than 50%+1, there are on specific matters of specific contexts. Most of the time, they are regarding a constitutional change. for instance, in a normal federation, the House of representatives is the representation of the global suffrage. But for a senate, it is rather a representation by regions to counter balance. That's also why a constitional change needs 50%+1 AND at least 7 out of 10 provinces. That rules is suppose to counter balance a too big province and avoid the so called tyrany of majority.

The separatist questions are already weakening Canada, driving away investment. For what? So some politicians can enlarge their fiefdoms? So some disgruntled people can stick it to the man? If either Alberta or Quebec actually separated it would go down in history as one of the worst, most shortsighted political moves of all time. And the way the Alberta story is being framed is not helping. "We need a strong Alberta in a strong Canada..." Well Duh!!! We already have that and we need all provinces to be "Stronger in a stronger Canada". The way to do that is to drop provincial barriers, not increase them. The Feds are not the problem here, the provinces are.

They're traitors. Simple as that. They hide behind notions of free speech and their women...of course. Its way past time to play as dirty as they do. These traitors want war...give it to them.

They're in scramble mode. There is no excuse for the action taken by this organization. Its all just hollow screaming. The Republicans need to play the same game the Demoncrats play. No mercy.

You show an ignorance of politics and history, and a severe lack of wisdom of how the world works. 4,671,008 voted in the 1995 Quebec referendum. Half of the would be 2,335,504. What do you think would have happened if 2,335,505 had voted to separate and 2,335,503 had voted to stay? Civil war in Quebec or endless referendums that settled nothing? The "No" option carried by a margin of 54,288 and that wasn't enough for a lot of separatists. And there are many instances of Democracies requiring more than 50%+1 for votes and referendums.

Well Tweenkies...you flooded Europe, England, Canastan and the USA with Muslims to sooth some strange form of guilt complex and now you see the results. We warned you this was not gonna end well, but you sent your volatile women out to scream and carry on like butt-hurt little freaks, while you brave Tweenkies manned up and hid behind their skirts. Is there any better example of the complete failure of Libbie ideals? No. This about sums the whole fiasco up perfectly. You are traitors to your nation's, your race and the global population, you disgusting little shits!

In 1980, Trudeau promised he would satisfy Quebec's change requests for the constitution. Requests that both sovereignists and nationalist federalists were asking. In 1981, he did the exact opposite and betrayed Quebec. In 1995, at first Chretien said he won't change anything. Then few days before the referendum, he promised he would accept modifications like proposed in the Meech lake agreement. An accord that died in 1990. 2 times that the federal made promises that not only it did not keep, it rather did the exact opposite after.

Who didn't ?

I watched the moon landing on tv. When it happened!

What promises? What votes?

I thought you guys hated the MSM? Seems like you spend a lot of time watching them.

That's the game. The federal makes promises, people in Quebec vote no. Then the federal does not fulfil its promises. Then Quebec brings back the question again. Quebec is in a constitutional impasse in this federation and since Ottawa does not want to solve anything, seperation becomes the only solution. You don't want the country to break? Then fix the problem. Then you admit you do not respect democracy. Don't pretend otherwise. If 40% of the population can decide the fate of the state against the will of 60%, that is no democracy. It means you think that some people has a higher value than others. People are not equal in your eyes. This is what anti-democratic people do when they can't find solutions. They want to remove your rights because they think they own you. They are the superior race. A race defined not by the quantity of melamines, but rather the will of keeping up with the status quo. So, do you have at least a paper from your doctor stating that you are superior to others?

+21% favourable, compared to PeePee at -8%, only 1% higher than Avi lewis, fahchrissake!

Read it and weep. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15876951/karmelo-anthony-trial-stabbing-austin-metcalf-case-footage-live-updates.html

Oh, that explains the defections.

Ok, I suppose we should go easier on the Conservatives. They're doing the best they can with what they've got.

No. I'm asking you. Quote the 'threats' Carney made. The threats are all coming from some Albertans who want to break up the country. And the obvious blackmail from cowardly id!ots like Smith.

See, this is what I mean. You simply cannot come up with any point to make. The evidence of what? That there was a stabbing? A killing? Sure. That was never in question at all. But I defy you to tell me why he didn't have a right to "stand his ground" and self defense?

50%+1 is THE ONLY ONE rule that everybody can agree on. It is the basis of democracy. Anything else means that one individual has a bigger value than another one. Therefore, Carney is anti-democratic. He has the right of having that opinion but, let's call a cat, a cat. He is anti-democratic, period. Is it what Canada is all about? A bloody imperium? Would you fight and kill Albertans if Ottawa ask you to do it?

British media at it again playing cover. Time to call the open border 3rd world traitors what they really are....Anti-White fascists. Violent destabilization and open ethnic conflict is inevitable as we approach demographic tipping points. This will spread all over the West.

Correct. I didn't do more than quickly scan your post. In fact, I rarely read or even look at most of your drivel. Between advanced scrubbing tech and carbon capture and storage, coal generators are actually quite clean now. In fact, they can now be used to reverse localized soil damage. But that's all gravey to me. The truth is, there will be more electricity generated and the idea drives you Tweenkies lulu. That's enough for me.

I see...another meltdown happening by a confux. Clearly your doctor did not prescribe the proper medicine for a LOSER like you. I am never up at 4AM... seems you have to be to take your meds....LOL But, as I said...I am in your head rent free so much you wake up to check if you got another post from me. As I said, I will not post to you if you do not post to me . But hey, LOSERS like you need complain about something so..have at it LOSER.